Rubrıc Generator

Built by a teacher

Stop writing rubrics at 10pm.

Pick your standards. Write what Meeting looks like. The other levels draft themselves around it — and you approve every line before a student sees it.

Free to use · No student accounts · Real standards libraries

This, in about the time it takes to describe the task.

One rubric, two renderings — same data.

Builds an argument from evidence CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.9-10.1
Your goal — Meeting
Makes a clear claim and supports it with evidence from at least two sources, explaining how each supports the claim.
Other levels

Approaching. Claim and evidence are both there, but the link is left implied.

Exceeding. Also weighs a counter-claim and explains why the evidence still holds.

Uses precise language CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.9-10.3
Your goal — Meeting
Chooses words that carry the intended shade of meaning, and keeps register consistent.
Other levels

Approaching. Meaning is clear; word choice general, register slips.

Exceeding. Word choice sharpens the argument, not just the style.

On a phone, Meeting leads — the goal, not a cell buried mid-grid.

Six steps. You own five of them.

1Choose standards— from real libraries, codes intactYou
2Say what it means here— for this task, not in generalYou
3Write the Meeting anchor— the one line that sets the barYou
4Draft the other levels— generated around your anchorAssisted
5Review every cell— edit anything, beside the source standardYou
6Publish— frozen snapshot; drafts stay yoursYou
Draft In review Published Only the last one reaches students.

Why not just ask a chatbot?

Generic AI

  • Invents criteria that sound right
  • Four levels, no anchor — so they drift into four different skills
  • You retype it into your own template
  • No record of where anything came from

Rubric Generator

  • Standards you picked, with codes and source text
  • You write Meeting; everything else is drafted to match it
  • Publishes to a student link and a printable table
  • Every cell carries provenance and quality flags
Common CoreNGSSWIDA ISTESHAPEACTFL + more

Students just open a link.

No account, no login, nothing to submit. Click through what they'd do:

No student accounts

No names, no sign-ups, nothing to administer.

No student work stored

They read the rubric. That's the whole surface.

Nothing student-side hits AI

The drafting happens on your side, before you publish.

Free to use.

Build projects, choose standards, write descriptors, publish, and the entire student side — free. A subscription covers the assisted drafting. Pricing is on the site.